Successful M&A's give branding a priority seat early on. Here's why.
Let’s play a branding game. Consider the following M&A scenarios:
A global leader in payments technology makes more than 25 acquisitions on five continents to drive growth and innovation against emerging tech upstarts.
A major investment firm completes series of acquisitions to fortify its strongly stalwart parent brand with scrappier, more risk-forward subsidiaries.
Two nationally known rival professional services firms merged to grow their share and achieve significant economies of scale.
When would you bring branding into each picture? Once the integration has started? After the customers and employees have heard the news? How about earlier? Here’s why:
The payments technology leader nearly failed in its acquisitions because, at first, it decided not to touch their already-established individual brands. The result? The marketplace and employees alike who were eager for a newly merged brand to transform their experience were confused and left grasping for answers.
The investment firm undertook extensive market research that defied their assumptions. Instead of simply absorbing its subsidiaries into its behemoth brand, a melding of the two seemingly incompatible “old guard” and “new guard” identities was the way to go. Discovering that early was imperative.
And the two rival professional services firms? The merger could have failed if they continued down the path their instincts led them: To convey the growth and economies of scale that made it a good deal FOR THEM. But, instead, fears of layoffs plagued employees and clients feared increased prices as they both yearned for the “why,” the compelling brand story and clear benefits that communicated why everyone outside the board room should be excited, too.
Branding is often an afterthought once an M&A is well underway. But that can be a tragic mistake. No other initiative can provide the unity, clarity, and solidarity necessary for M&A success before, during, and after the transition.
But how do you build a brand when you don’t have the puzzle pieces of a merger or acquisition in place? In this context, branding is more than a name, logo, or tagline. Your brand conveys the reason your business exists and how it intends to have an impact. It gives customers, employees, partners, and investors a reason to believe that the merged entity will benefit them. If those considerations aren’t laid out from the beginning, then what’s the point of the integration? How will you convince any stakeholders outside the money-holders to rally around it?
Listen. We know it’s hard enough for marketing to get a seat at the M&A strategy table. Why leverage a seat for branding, too? It all comes down to seven imperatives that we outline in our new resource guide, The Secret to M&A Success? It’s in the Brand.
Here’s a sneak peek:
Branding teams can work in tandem with integration management companies (IMOs) because much of what they do overlaps. Market research, project management, and deliverables can be shared from the start.
This is imperative because branding can help identify and address market attitudes early on. You could assume you know how your customers will react to the news or what questions or concerns they’ll have, but those assumptions are often dangerously misinformed. And, once you lose your stakeholders, it’s that much harder to win them back.
Employee attitudes can make or break a merger or acquisition as much as customer sentiment. And, yes, branding can help with that, too. A powerful new brand can help bring together diverse workforces, mindsets, and cultures, uniting employees around a common value proposition and purpose.
What’s in a name? Everything. Naming a company, product lines and services during a merger or acquisition is critically important and should never be left decided at a midnight brainstorming session. Instead, it’s an essential piece in a brand architecture strategy, and no two strategies are the same.
And while branding should be part of M&A preparations from the onset, successfully unveiling the brand can be a delicate matter of timing. The earlier you consider it, though, the more time you have to reveal it, whether incrementally or all at once. Remember that hundreds of digital and physical assets are affected, so use your time wisely.
It’s a common question for newlyweds. Do they each keep their birth names, opt to use one name, or hyphenate? When B2B brands marry, however, the name game gets really tricky.
It’s even more acute when the merging enterprises occupy the same business segment and are merging equals. Sometimes it’s relatively simple…
According to the Harvard Business Review, “study after study puts the failure rate of mergers at somewhere between 70-90%.” More often than not, brand is not promoted or leveraged to provide unity, clarity and solidarity during this critical inflection point, yet brand can make all the difference between success and failure for the companies…
From a business perspective, few things are as critical to get right as a major merger or acquisition — and few things are as challenging. On the long list of considerations during M&A activity, merger branding is one of the most crucial. Not getting brand right is a key reason that, according to the…